Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Mixed-method approach to institutional political translation: a contrastive study of Obama and Trump

Abstract

This article analyses the methodology used in the author’s PhD thesis on the translation of institutional political speeches from the White House. Using a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative and quantitative analyses, it examines speeches by Barack Obama and Donald Trump and their translations into Spanish. Based on the theories of Al-Juwaid, Gallardo Paúls, Fairclough and Van Dijk, we apply techniques of argumentative, discursive and rhetorical analysis. The results reveal significant differences in argumentative structure, the use of rhetorical resources and their translation. The methodology allows us to identify patterns of discursive manipulation and to evaluate the coherence of institutional translations. This work highlights the importance of an integrative approach to analyse translated political speeches from a critical perspective, contributing to the knowledge of institutional translation in political contexts. By means of this mixed-method approach, we seek to establish the suitability of this methodological framework to identify ideological and discursive elements in the discourses analysed as a preliminary phase of the translation process, in this case, in the English/Spanish language pair.

Keywords

Institutional translation, political discourse, mixed-method analysis, translation, discourse analysis, Pragmatics

PDF

References

  1. Al-Juwaid, Waleed Ridha Hamoodi. 2019. The Pragmatics of Cogent Argumentation in British and American Political Debates. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  2. Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Caldas-Courthard, Carmen, and Malcolm Courthard. 1996. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
  4. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2008. Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Daghigh, Ali, et al. 2018. Translation of Political Speeches: Theories and Practices. Tehran: Rahnama Press.
  6. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
  7. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
  8. Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz. 2014. Usos políticos del lenguaje. Un discurso paradójico. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  9. Hurtado Albir, Amparo, and Lucía Molina. 2002. “Translation Techniques Revisited: A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 47 (4): 498–512.
  10. Hurtado Albir, Amparo. 2001. Traducción y traductología. Introducción a la traductología. Madrid: Cátedra.
  11. López Ruiz, María del Carmen. 2022. La traducción de discursos políticos en contextos institucionales. El análisis del discurso aplicado a la traducción inglés/español de Barack H. Obama y Donald J. Trump. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Córdoba.
  12. Searle, John Rogers. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Seghiri, Miriam. 2012a. Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Methodology and Applications. Granada: Comares.
  14. Seghiri, Miriam. 2012b. Corpus Linguistics and Translation: Methods and Techniques. Granada: Comares.
  15. Van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” European Journal of Communication 15 (1): 5–56.
  16. Van Dijk, Teun A. 2003. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 352–371. Malden, MA: Blackwell.